You want to feel righteous. I want to save people. Your method is guaranteed to save none. Mine could maybe save some.

You can run around screaming no more dead babies while people continue to die or you can actually do things that have a chance of ever helping.

Theoretically if everyone in the world all together agreed with you then your method would work. I feel quite confident that is never going to happen.

What does it mean to unflinchingly stand against genocide? Is your opinion that when given the trolly problem the correct answer is scream at the trolly that it isn’t supposed to kill people? Does that fix the problem.

Be careful with your conviction without decision as it is more likely to be taken advantage of than to ever help you or others. “Only a Sith deals in absolutes.” - Apparently a Sith Obi-Wan Kenobi

How often have you been in a position where you had to chose between results and principles?

Politicians who stand unflinchingly on their convictions do not serve the people. You will never hear the voices of those who fell on their swords to avoid going against their morals, for they are dead and their swords are buried in what could have been our ally.

Sounds like it’s time to call in Barack Obama.