Beyond this, especially given his recent remarks, he seems to like attractive (and successful) men. Not going to theorise on repressed homosexuality or anything, on this, just staring an observation.
So it makes sense that he’d want to be in favour of Mamdani - he’s attractive, he’s successful, he’s liked, so he’s trying to suck up to him.
Or hanging from some nicely braided hemp.
There was an article just yesterday about how Trump threatened an unnamed AI CEO that they should be very careful and think about their kids and wife…
What’s up with fascists taking up all the good names and symbols?
(rhetorical question, I know the answer very well)
Arguably it was smart of her to expose her shittiness right before the election
So, let me see…
The Dems couldn’t rig the election in 2024 when they had control of the government.
But somehow they did rig it in 2020 and now this year, when Trump is in power and has a tighter control over the entire government?
Not to be confused with the ObaMarch protests
I think this level of stupid requires effort.
Oh, he knows how to end that war.
Problem is, Bibi has a biiiig handful of kompromat, which allows him to reach up Trump’s arse like a Muppet and control him.
Watch the government designate People Against Genocide a terrorist group within days…
It’s really simple, those who aren’t US citizens, aren’t people - according to MAGA.
“The opposing candidate is not perfect/only slightly better, so we may as well wallow in shit up to our noses instead of it being only up to our chest”
So you’d rather the Dems “did the right thing”^(1) and kept losing?
Wasn’t the entirety of their loss in 2024 due to them playing by the rules, taking the high road, and “doing the right thing”?
The dilemma here is choosing between:
^(1) Is it even the right thing to blow a case up knowing it will have no effect beyond MAGA shitstains harassing the victims to no end? That the victims will never see justice?
Obviously that’s the ideal situation.
Question is, when was this file compiled? Was there even a chance of bringing it to a truly independent DoJ?
I see your point, but you got to understand there’s multiple layers to this.
They could’ve brought up this case earlier, but it would’ve changed nothing. It would’ve been swallowed by the constant shit tsunami generated by his orange rapistness. It would’ve gone on the pile of “shit he did but won’t get punished for”. After all there won’t be an investigation, a legal case, anything.
This is only useful as political munition, and should be used as such. It won’t WIN them directly anything, but it might tilt things enough with the “undecided” voters to provide an upper edge.
Or would you rather they released this 8-10 months ago, and resulted in nothing but a week or two of headlines?
Yes, but also not just corruption.
The rich can throw their economic weight around in a number of ways.
For example, an employer of 10-50-100k people could say that if certain laws get passed, they’ll simply… stop operating in the country, because losing said operations isn’t as much a loss than what those new laws introduce.
And politicians do have to consider the livelihood of those people. It’s not like a new company will pop up and buy all the equipment, hire those people, and provide economic stability for 10-100 thousand families. The company leaving doesn’t just mean a drop in tax revenue, but also now up to 500k people are destitute and require government support to survive.
Cruelty was always the point.
MAGA won’t admit it, but they didn’t vote for their own prosperity at the price of others’ - they purely voted to make things worse for “the enemy”.
I really do wish Trump would try to turn over one of those pardons to chase some made up crimes that clearly fail in court - just so he sets precedence and enables the next non-MAGA government to wipe out his pardons as well and mop up his ilk for every single cent misappropriated (not to mention the lives his regime cost, the treasons etc.)
Fetterman should’ve been kicked out of the DNC ages ago.