Echo Dot

I mean I’m opposed fundamentally to reducing people’s rights for no readily apparent reason simply because some pearl clutches, who it doesn’t in fact affect, are upset about it. In fact I think that if a bill is proposed that pearl clutches get upset about, I’m all the more in support for it, fuck these guys.

Why on earth do we spend any time listening to them? We don’t take advice from flat earthers on science funding, so why do we need to listen to religious nuts when it comes to trans rights? In fact there’s plenty in the church that would be opposed to this bill simply because it’s infringing on people’s freedoms, so it’s not even the entire church. This fact alone should kill the discussion. I’m so sick of these arse wipes constantly trying to re-litigate things simply because they don’t like the outcome.

Will at least she has an appropriate name. I guess Cressida Traitor-To-The-Nation, is a bit of a mouthful.

God, you can’t sell anyone these days.

So a reform MP then? They probably all shower WhatsApp group.

Pardon me if I don’t give a fuzzy rats arse what Laura thinks about any particular situation. She’s not a journalist she’s a right wing hack. It would be bad enough if she was working for LBC but she’s on the BBC and it’s ridiculous.

Oh there is definitely a reckoning to be had over at Ofcom, no doubt Nigel Farage is not the only one on the take from shadowy crypto billionaires.

I’ve never really looked into it because I’ve never particularly felt the need to carry one around

Oh no I’m not allowed a murderous weapon, what a restrictive country I live in I don’t know how I cope. The day I wasn’t able to randomly kill someone who cut me off in traffic. What an utterly appalling infringement on my freedoms.

I think flock is a pretty egregious example though. The corrupt us police were using it for personal reasons most of which were nefarious.

I’m not sure if Americans can really articulate this because they’re kind of used to their police being the enemy, but I think the larger issue isn’t so much the cameras themselves, it’s mass surveillance by an organization that is barely one step above criminals.

Well there’s also the safety issue that the US actually does have, that a lot of people don’t perform basic maintenance on their vehicles and drive around in death traps, with bald tyres, rusted axles, and wheels that are the barely attached to the vehicle. It would be fine if they only killed themselves, but they often take a few other people along with them.

I suppose it’s because there hasn’t been any stories about the police abusing their powers and following their exes around. I’m sure it happens there’s just not been any stories about it.

Other one thing I will say is this, I used to actually watch the road traffic cameras so we could report in accidents and breakdowns on the motorways and trust me no one can track you using those cameras you could barely tell what colour of the car was, make and model you had no chance. You wouldn’t have thought they would still make cameras with the resolution of 720i, but apparently they still do.

He isn’t. He’s just better then all the other options, at best he’s adequate in a sea of uselessness.

Nothing new really. What is annoying is they’ve said this but haven’t really given any reasons so no one can tell if anything has changed.

I got given a 10 pound bonus ones, this hundred quid feels like the same sort of energy.

I mean I’m not going to turn down free money but it’s not exactly a stimulus check. I spend more on that on food in a month.

God I love the blue on blue going on here.

He’s going down for attacking journalists at the mail. The Mail. Did this idiot forget which side his bread is buttered?

Yeah because Kirk was killed by someone on their side so they don’t want to bring too much attention to that.

The killer was white, male, and a right wing extreme is nut job. There’s not much for them to work with there.

He’s also an idiot. What’s the point of trying to defend this particular moron? He’s going to prison, there is no defense against what he has done to himself.

I mean you can see why it changed his name. Most of his supporters wouldn’t be able to spell it otherwise.

GB news violates Ofcom on a daily basis, but they just don’t bother to enforce their own rules.

For example they’re not really supposed to be calling themselves a news organization unless they conform to editorial standards. Yet they call themselves a news channel all the time and Ofcom just sit there.

If I were Labour I’d be hauling them in front of a select committee. The bias and ridiculous double standards are blatant.