• 1 Post
  • 19 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 21st, 2023

help-circle





  • I’m still thinking of a response too. Transparency generally is better.

    My argument would mainly be that the cost is a barrier to normal people and academics looking to do research that would benefit the public. I personally wanted to do research about our local area to see how much land is publicly vs privately owned but the cost of access prohibited me from doing it. However, if I was rich I could just pay, so it’s an unfair to have a unnecessary cost being in the way.

    Anti-money laundering is always a good one.

    We already provide company information for free so why should this be any different. If Companies House can operate in this way there is absolutely no reason why the Land Registry cannot. Submitters pay fees when submitting and that should be enough to cover the costs.

    It could save on legal fees when buying a property or settling boundary disputes.

    It would help businesses where the information could help them find potential clients or for infrastructure projects.

    It would help leaseholders to understand who actually owns the land before having to pay solicitors to do checks. Most people go for the cheapest conveyancing so I would guess things are easily missed, especially if each request is a separate cost.

    It would help renters to understand who actually owns the property they are looking to rent. Tenants often only know the Agent and have to rely on everybody acting faithfully. The cost prohibits normal renters checking but free access might mean more checks are available.

    Fundamentally, we have right to know who owns what where our homes, communities, businesses, jobs and travel in between is vital to us.




  • brewery@feddit.uktoUnited Kingdom@feddit.uk•White plus plus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    25 days ago

    Hate is hate, racism is racism. There are and should be no levels of them. Who makes the rules for what is more or less racist? Why should any be tolerated?

    When I was 12 and an idiot in many ways, I might’ve responded to many racist words against me (I am of Sikh heritage) with racist words back because that’s just a simple and natural response. The correct thing to do is to pull us both up on it equally and say both are wrong and get an equal punishment, or even better, education on why they are wrong to use. Now if that happens between a Sikh and a Muslim, both would be “equally racist”. If it was between a Sikh and a Jewish person, then even if the Jewish person “started it”, you are saying the Sikh should be punished more because one is worse than the other? How about if the antisemitism does not mention the holocaust?

    It just doesn’t make any sense to single one thing out when we have clear guidance and public acceptance on what is racism and that it should be stamped out.

    It is good to point out that antisemitism is rising. However, any person making that argument cannot deny that islamophobia is also rising, as is anti-immigrant hate. We should be looking to combat all of it, overwise you are saying one group of people is more important that another, which is by definition racism.

    You can’t combat racism with more racism!

    It is clear that antisemitism is being taken more seriously by the British establishment than any other forms of racism. Even on a personal level, I am often mistaken to be Muslim and suffer racism from time to time, and the Sikh community has suffered anti-Sikh racism. I am still supportive of stamping out all racism including antisemitism and islamaphobia.

    Academics and International bodies agree that what happened and still happening in Gaza is genocide.

    OAPs get arrested for holding up signs whilst a public group of white supremists with public Instagram accounts marching in hoods on our streets aren’t even being tracked by the police:







  • If more money is going to UK workers than more money is paid in UK taxes or spent in the UK economy. Right now, the UK workers get as small as amount as possible whilst the profits is extracted to shareholders who are either:

    • mostly outside the UK, (no UK tax or spending)
    • are pension pots where the UK tax is lower and the money is tied up for a long time before being spent, or
    • are UK investors, who again pay less tax (investment is taxed less than employment income) and wealthy people spend less of their money on things than poorer people

    Yes it would cost more in the short term but lead to long term growth.

    That’s just from an economic point of view, not mentioning human dignity, helping the poorest, reducing inequality, etc.



  • Danny Tommo is a man of the people so we should leave him alone!

    For examples:

    • Daniel Thomas went to a private school in Hampshire.
    • He was charged with kidnapping to which he pleaded guilty.
    • He is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon"s (aka Tommy Robinson) close associate and for a time his bodyguard.
    • He"s been banned from France after his “protests” there.
    • He’s traveled all over the country instigating various types of “protests”, showing he clearly has no full time job but is managing to fund himself or get money from somewhere.
    • He’s a “born again Christian” which he sometimes shows on his live streams by kissing his cross on his necklace (this is true and was so fucking bizarre!).

    His quotes after he went to Belfast:

    What I’ve witnessed in Belfast has given me the inspiration to realise that when everyone gets involved who’s committed, a change can be made. We are going to produce a patriotic army of thousands and thousands of English and British men that are done with protesting, done with walking down roads, and want to make a difference.

    He started the Patriot Platform which publicly organised the Portsmouth mob but guess the police are too busy arresting the obviously more dangerous grannies who dare to hold up signs.



  • There’s video, photo and text evidence all over his and other thugs’ social media. You can search for them online calling for vigilante actions, violent behaviour, calling for a civil war, direct anti-Muslim hatred, anti-immigrant behaviour, targeting the RNLI, and organising “protests” all over the country. In one week he posted that he was in Belfast, Epsom (Surrey), Central London, Southamptom and what looked to be. A small group of people are literally going around terrorising local communities without a care for the actual people living there.

    He’s been convicted of kidnapping and had one arrest at an airport. Yet pensioners holding a sign saying certain words get their houses raided.