For reelection in Kansas you probably would be advised to take this stance.

You need urinals in some fashion, a row of standing urinals can be pretty private if you just have a tall divider, but their throughput is so much higher it would be terrible if you lost them in high traffic areas.

That’s absolutely not true, who are you counting?

Not really, the speaker is an internal election. But the people running for Congress weren’t campaigning on who to vote for speaker. You’re also arguing that but you’re just assuming the majority doesn’t want them as leadership. That’s not how any of this works.

This is some terrible website here

Like saying mixed is any better

No if you actually watched it he said at the start that the committees, which is what the guys here are on, will be handling that.

Some of them were built with the shift in Latino votes being assumed.

It’s an indictment of the party nomination primary and voting system. A ranked choice with more candidates would have worked much better.

Speaker doesn’t have to be current elected person, they could still pick Obama if they want. Trump would hate that.

With this large of a pool you will probably have a pretty guaranteed spot for speaker since they can tolerate a lot of no votes. If things don’t go well you can expect a speaker change within a year.

Specifically if there is a higher than expected turnout or swing you can overflow and lose more seats than if you haven’t gerrymandered.

She wasn’t even old enough to be president when the primary started. It’s not a rush. Following the traditional get experience in Congress and federal cabinet position is better.

Obama is still young enough that after a long break now he could do another Senate term or a relatively brief federal judge shipfor 5to7 years comfortably.

Wouldn’t that just be dementoid?

Technically I think the rules say that if you make the tiniest error it could invalidate it. The SCOTUS rulings don’t say that but if sent to them now they could change that. That’s usually based on discretion and a judges opinion, why having fascist toadies in all the steps is a big deal. There’s multiple steps with different judges having opportunity to pause it, so this probably won’t happen. But it’s enough to wreck a regular person’s life even without final denaturalization.

If they really want you can detect audio through walls and window vibration and some keyboard and computer activity from power line.

For an old fat guy there’s a pretty high actuarial chance they don’t make it another few years. But the point of running is that being a presidential candidate by itself makes you able to run pacs and take in bribe money. So they will be running for president for the next term no matter what.

It’s based solely on the republican primary which isn’t even a governmental event.

No it’s the Russian system. Everyone in the administration gets bribes and kickbacks all the time, only those who fall out of favor get exposed, there is no actual calling that doesn’t matter. It’s just a way of punishing people that displease trump by exposing their shocking corruption, while everyone else’s is there but hidden. When everyone gets corruption only those who are naughty to the president get punished.