You see phrasing like that in the news quite a lot, where they squeeze their occupation into a sentence. Here’s another random example: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cw62y04r563po
Former fish and chip shop owner John Dutton suffered a severe stroke…
Maybe it looks a bit off because you’d usually write “painter and decorator”? It’s normal to say “painter decorator” for short though.
And somebody in this comment chain has been literally misled
At least people on coke are fun. Can’t be doing with the guy that smokes weed and ignores everyone for the rest of the night. I’ve never tried cocaine but I’ve always hated the messiness of it. People do lines off dirty surfaces or snort it from a key. They must lose like 20% of it, and it’s spenny too. Just get a tiny spoon or something you useless cokeheads.
I hate suspended sentences for being so misleading in headlines
You should be fined £100 for making me read that
First they came for the rabbit owners. And I did not speak up. Because I was in the mood for some stew.
“No circumstances” is a bit extreme. What if we were under active invasion by super nazis that wanted to force us to eat our pets and outlaw pubs?
Now THAT would be news. Undercover investigation reveals Reform are treating minorities well.
“Not Israel?” “Well… <exasperated sigh>”
He’s probably the stingiest bastard of all
I’ve had beggars try to give me their stuff instead of asking for anything
Yes but when they see me sat with my stained shirt and 10 year old phone, they know there’s no hope for a tip so they hit the 0.
Maybe you just look like a cheapskate
A mate of mine is a manager at Lidl and he says they’ve had AI cameras installed recently. From looking around online it looks like they trialled it in London a year ago. My friend’s store is up North so I guess they’re rolling it out everywhere else.
Apparently they can detect people putting objects in their pocket and there’s an overhead message telling them to take it out. I’m looking forward to going and experimenting to see how shit it is.
Well no but I guess sometimes they get lucky
Makes it more fun. The lawmakers know what they’re doing
Banning all trans people sounds like discrimination to me. If you want to hide behind the (bullshit) Supreme Court decision, you have to allow trans men too. Surely?