• 0 Posts
  • 30 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 14th, 2023

help-circle


  • While i do not doubt that you’d need infinite time to read a single article. I managed just fine in 2 minutes.

    It’s pretty clear what I’ve said for those who can read. And most of it seems to be because people like you type shit without even bothering to read what it is you’re commenting on. Just going around spreading misinformation. But just for you. I’ll use small words.

    He just wants to sing and that’s it. He did not want to get involved at all in this ‘fight’. I think it’s cowardly. Ed also has (or had) hundreds of people working for the tour. That may very well rely on the tour to bring home money. He has enough money to say fuck it and go home. Same can’t be said for everyone else.

    And don’t worry, there’s no ego to wound here.

    Trying to waste others time by making them deny or defend against baseless claims is the type of shit Trump does. And the only measured response is to not even dignify it.


  • The rumor mill that gave me most of what I know about this incident didn’t tell me that piece, so that’s why I’m “on about” not knowing what you know.

    And here I assumed you’d read the same article we’re both commenting under where they said as much. My mistake.

    It would be interesting to see what would have happened had Macklemore spoke about Africa

    No it wouldn’t. We both know nothing would happen.

    I think that’s lame. You do not.

    Don’t put words in my mouth. It’s not going to get you anywhere.

    As far as Macklemore is concerned, this is the best outcome possible. He gets tons of free publicity, and the topic he spoke about gets even more coverage as a result of what happened. And everytime Ed performs without his openers, the papers will talk about why that is.


  • But then why ban Macklemore unless he suspected Macklemore would’ve gone on a political rant?

    He wasn’t banned ahead of going on a “political rant”, he was removed after. So I don’t know what you’re on about there.

    Regardless, not using your platform to advocate for people without a platform is a form of complicity.

    That is highly debatable. I heard no one go on a “political rant” about the various internal conflicts in Africa. Are they complicit in those because of that? If an artist just wants to do their art. I say fair enough. I strongly disagree that it’s a form of complicity




  • It’s not just Ed, There are so many other people tied to the tour and they need money. Sound guys, lights, security, electricity, networks/communications, scene builders, fixtures, etc. Probably far more than most of us realise.

    If Ed decides to cancel the entire tour over it. I’m sure he would be fine. But maybe not everyone else. I still think it’s cowardly to not even try to stand up for your fellow artist. But I can understand if he feels responsible for everyone that relies on the tour to bring home money to their families.



  • If it was a clear and cut case of contract breach for the tour, that would be one thing. But it doesn’t sound like that’s what it was about. So Ed is getting dragged for not standing up for his fellow artist.

    From what I’ve gathered, Ed pretty much just threw his hands up and said, “I don’t want to get involved, you guys figure it out.” Fair enough if that’s the case. That’s his choice. But we see the result of what people think about those who take the cowards way out.

    He doesn’t want to deal with politics. He just wants to perform. And I get that. But it’s still cowardly to not stand up for your fellow artist. And that’s why everyone else is dropping out.








  • You are free to do what you wish. He is free to do what he wishes with his money. The other co-founder is free to think whatever he wants about it.

    The only thing I’ve done is bringing up that “flamman” is not a reliable publication. And should not be used as the main source of any claim. Since then a smörgårdsbord of other more reliable sources have been dug up that corroborate the reporting of the party’s views on certain topics.